A book, a film and the truth

December 31, 2009 by Chetan Bhagat

Dear All,

The 3 Idiots story credit issue has been making some noise now. The
news is coming out in bits and pieces, and I think it is important I
clarify a few things. Yes, clearly, the makers of the film have been
unfair and thousands of my readers have been saying so. I am aware of
this, and this is not an issue that has 'just come up'. I've been
grappling with it for two years, but kept silent about it.

The only reason it has surfaced after the movie's release is because
Five Point Someone has a few million readers, and when you copy a
popular story claiming it as 'original' and 'completely different',
people are going to find out. People did, and so did a lot of media
journalists.

The case is as simple as the makers claiming the story as their own,
and clearly it is not. Pre-release, the makers made press statements
like the movie is only 'very loosely', '2%-5% inspired by the book'.
After release, those who have read the book and seen the movie (and
frankly, I think those are the only people who have the right to
comment) find the film to be an adaptation of Five Point Someone. The
setting, characters, plotline, dramatic twists and turns, one-liners,
theme, message – almost all aspects that make up the story are from
FPS. Yes, there are some changes, any adaptation requires that – but
it is no way an original story. Leading movie critics have privately
admitted to me that the film is 70% the book. Still, don't take my
word for it – go read the book, watch the film.

I, frankly, was shocked to see this. This is because I was also fed
'this is an original movie' line a lot. I wanted to see the final
script – it was never shown to me. I wanted to see the film before
release – it was not shown to me (even though trials had been done for
people). What's more, the makers had called me to their office and
pressured me several times to withdraw my 'Based on a novel by'
credit, which was by contract. They told me they'd replace it with
something like 'initiated by' – a credit that doesn't exist anywhere
in the world. I still told them that if the film is indeed original,
I'll happily withdraw the credit, but somehow the promos don't tell me
so. I asked them to show me the film and they fell silent.

Soon, they started doing media promotions for the film, and kept me
completely out of it (you'll never find me in an interview with them).
Crores was poured into publicity on shutting me out and cementing the
fact that 3 Idiots is not based on Five Point Someone. However, the
book had been read by millions of people and the FPS buzz just did not
die down.

Ten days before the release, I was called into their office. They said
'we should be friends now'. I said I am always up for friendship, and
the success of the film is good for me as well. They also said, and I
quote verbatim 'even though this is an original film, we have given
you a great credit, right upfront. After all, we love writers and a
king should treat another king with respect. You are family'. I
believed them.

I called my family before release, and told them all not to expect
FPS. I even gave a few interviews where I said don't expect FPS.

Then I went for the premiere. My family sat in the theatre shocked, as
sequence after sequence came from the book. 2%-5% means 3-6 minutes,
and I had told my family to look for the few FPS moments and note
them. However, there were so many that it became impossible to keep
track. The plot line was same – people meet at ragging, the first
class with definition of machine, the friends separate, Alok (Raju)
moves with Venkat (Chatur), Ryan (Rancho) helps Alok's father, Alok
rejoins group etc etc. From Alok (Raju) jumping to stealing the
papers and calling out from Cherian (Virus') office – the book came
alive on screen. I was surprised and happy that FPS has made it in
such a grand way.

However, my family had not spotted my credit in the beginning (there
was none) and they were feeling let down. A screenplay associate
credit to VVC had a prominent upfront placement. The story credit was
not shared with me. And yes, all the office talk of a 'king treated
like king' was a white lie.

I knew they had played with me, and that 'based on a novel by' credit,
which they were legally bound to give would be hushed away at the end
– with the clear intention of making sure people miss it. And indeed,
it came after the junior artists and still photographer of the movie,
and zoomed away fast. My own mother missed seeing my name, and for
that she cried after seeing the film. I told her it doesn't matter, as
people know FPS. But yes, that hurt me a lot.

I went up to the makers after the premiere, and they said it is a hit
so chill and forget about it. I guess I could, but it is hard. Only a
writer or a creative person knows how this feels. I am one of the
lucky ones that people have read FPS. Imagine the fate of other
writers in Bollywood. Anyway, I came home and thanked God for making
my story reach so many people.

Upon the film's release – my mailbox and twitter account, literally
became flooded. Fans and readers wrote stunned mails. They had seen
the makers' interviews which had denied FPS links and they missed
seeing the credit on screen. I kept quiet, though I did send a message
to the makers telling them audience reactions. They did not respond.
Soon media journalists saw the film. They called me and said they have
to do a story on this as they are on my side. I tried my best to avoid
them. However, many have helped me in the past and I can't avoid their
call forever. One HT journalist from Delhi called, and asked me how I
felt about the credit. I used one word – I said 'strange'. And that's
when the news exploded.

This my friends, is the story. Meanwhile, the makers have accused me
of seeking fame – when clearly it is the other way round. They've
taken my story to make fame for themselves, and shut me out of it. I
know my readers will spot it immediately. However, the film also
reaches millions of other people who do not read books – and they
deserve to know who wrote the story. And that is why I am talking
about this issue (and I admit for people who've read the book, they
may wonder it's so obvious so why I am going on about it).

I hope my explanation helps. I do have a few additional points to make.
This has nothing to do with Mr. Aamir Khan – while the makers are
fronting him to talk about the issue (as he has the credibility), this
is not about him at all. I am a big fan of Aamir and he has made my
story reach people. However, he was told by the makers not to read the
book, and he hasn't. Thus, he cannot comment on the issue in a
meaningful manner. The media should stop questioning him. When I met
him, both of us were told that the movie is original and not the book.
He was asked not to read the book – and I wasn't shown the script. Go
figure.

I don't need this kind of fame – It doesn't do anything for me. Like I
said, I am lucky to have channels to express my opinion. Other writers
don't. I can't tell you how much it hurts when this happens. Imagine
someone takes your child, dresses him up and tells the world it is
theirs. I've felt the pain for two years on this issue but I kept
silent on it. I can't help it if millions have read the book and see
the movie upon release and spot the issue themselves.

I don't want anything from them – They've taken the story credit. Let
them keep it. All Bollywood award functions have an award for 'story',
apart from other categories. They'll collect it all year around and
feel good about it. I didn't write the story for awards. I wrote it as
I felt I had something to say about the education system and the race
for grades. I have my fans' love and I am more than happy with it.

The odds - They have an army of people to promote their side of the
story, crores of media budgets and are sparing no efforts to bring me
down. The only thing I have is my fans, and the truth. But then, the
truth is Krishna, and the Pandavas had only that while there was an
army on the other side. Remember who won that battle?

Some people have told me that I should keep silent. I did try to be
silent but didn't work. Also, people say this is how Bollywood works.
Sorry, I disagree. Not all Bollywood works like this. There are a lot
of good people too. And every event like this helps change things for
the better. And that is what I am all about anyway.

I urge you to not believe me at face value. Read the book, see the
movie – and like the movie says – think for yourself and decide.

I want to thank the media journalists who are supporting me. Yes, the
makers on the other side have a lot of stature – but truth comes above
stature – that's the first rule of journalism. I salute you for having
the courage to stick to that. Our country does have free press, and
thank God for that.

Like I said, I don't need anything. Even if I have no more movies made
on my stories or nobody wants to read my books and columns, I'll
happily join ISKCON and dedicate my life to Krishna.

But I will not shy away from the truth – ever.

Blessings,
Me

Bhagat upset over story credit for 3 Idiots

Aditya Gupta
Mumbai, December 29, 2009

Writer Chetan Bhagat is upset with the makers of 3 Idiots, the film
based on his bestselling novel Five Point Someone. He says he has not
been given due credit for the story.

"I wasn't shown the film (before its release) or even the full script.
I was only told that a lot of changes had been made (in the story).
The film's makers have not even given me credit for the story. I don't
know why they have done this," says Bhagat.

"There was this news going around that the film is loosely inspired by
my book. But when we saw the film, we realised that it basically
followed the book. Some extra bits had been added, like in the climax.
But 75 per cent of the film was based on my book," he says.

Referring to a proper story credit being given to him in the film
Hello, Bhagat says: "Almost any film made worldwide on a book always
has proper acknowledgement to the writer."

Bhagat also refers to Slumdog Millionaire, which is based on Vikas
Swarup's novel Q&A, as an example. "The film was changed a lot. But
when (director) Danny Boyle took the Oscar, he thanked Vikas in his
speech," he says.

"The makers of 3 Idiots have legitimately taken the rights (of the
book) and made the payments, but somehow they wanted to project that
this is their story. But you can't do that with a book like Five Point
Someone, which is the highest selling book in the country," says
Bhagat.

The Curious Case of Phunsuk Wangdu:

Prequel to Taare Zameen Par

SPOILERS GALORE THROUGHOUT

Really! Is this it? Even if one were to suggest that all the 5 stars ratings had hyped up the film a bit too much for me…still, is this it? I mean, seriously, is 3 Idiots really the best film of the year…the best since Lagaan as some people are calling it? I'm surely missing something here. Either that or, Akshay Kumar never quite realized that all he had to do to elevate his films from the 'low-brow & crude' humour tag that they were pinned with was to sprinkle them with some convenient pop-philosophy and a pretentious life-affirming feel-good message. Because, really, that is the feeling I got after spending 3 hours with the 3 idiots and the 3 hundred more in the auditorium. Of course, I'll be the first to admit that I am in the teensiest minority possible here since the whole crowd was laughing with the film, and everyone I know loves the film, like I don't remember in recent memory. So, being the biggest Idiot of them all, I request you to not read the following as my 'review' of the film. I surrender; I'm ill-equipped to review a film that I don't 'get'?

3 Idiots begins then with one of the idiots Farhan Quereshi (Madhavan) faking a heart attack to land a plane, and then con a cab driver at the airport into taking him to his friend's house, the second idiot, Raju Rastogi (Sharman Joshi) who joins him in a hurry without any pants on! An emergency landing and a pant-less dash better be worth something…it is. For they've just found out the whereabouts of the third idiot of their triumvirate…Ranchoddas Chanchad (Aamir Khan) who'd just as mysteriously disappeared from their lives as he had entered. Ranchoddas aka Rancho impressed Farhan and Raju on his first day at the Imperial College of Engineering (ICE) hostel when he gets even with his ragging seniors by proving that salt water is a good conductor of electricity! Wonderful, right? Yes! That he does so by electrocuting the penis of the senior in question who is about to piss on Rancho's door is another matter. We've all had a hearty laugh…and that should be it! You can't even call it crude, because hey…it's also very clever, you see. You're electrocuting a man's dick, but you're also learning about salt water! That is what Rancho's caboodle of education seems to be- to not merely learn by rote, but to understand stuff and employ it in your daily life. Noble indeed! That the manifestation of this comes by way of electrocuting dicks (repeated again in the climax of the film) and delivering babies on a ping-pong table with the help of a vacuum cleaner (I kid you not!) shouldn't be a bother!

Supposedly then, this film is about the education system and what's wrong with it. But save a scene where a professor insists on the 'definition' of machine instead of an explanation of it, what flaws of the system does it really address? Is it really a scathing remark on the education system when an examiner refuses to accept the answer-papers of students who turn up late for the exam? This when they've conveniently not bothered to inform the examiner of the truly justified reason for their being late! We hardly see the professors of the ICE. All we encounter over and over again is the Principal, Viru Sahastrabuddhe (Boman Irani) aka ViruS and his encounters with Rancho & Co. When Rancho is not offering Virus free suicide statistics (the film chooses to see only the system as responsible for student-suicides, and not ragging…which actually has been proven to be the reason for more suicides than parental and peer pressure), he and his idiots are busy turning up at his daughter's engagement or pissing on his front door! Yes, for though it is unfair of a senior to piss on a junior's door (ragging that is met with penile electrocution)…it is supposedly just and funny for two students to piss on the front door of their Principal's house! Because Virus is evil, you see. The murderer, as he is dubbed, responsible for students committing suicides. And that is what the film eventually boils down to. Not a comment on the education system per se, but a personal one-upmanship between the 3 Idiots and Virus. Unlike Munna Bhai MBBS, where along with Boman's Dr. Asthana, the whole medical fraternity and the hospital staff and its patients alike were imparted valuable lessons in life; or Lage Raho Munna Bhai, where Gandhigiri wasn't used merely to reform Boman's sardar, but sold as a relevant catchphrase to the apathetic society in general…3 Idiots doesn't have a large-scale awakening.

What it does have is a catchphrase- All Izz Well…a catchphrase that it oversells, to the point of contriving an extremely far-fetched scene that is intended to make the term iconic. In the Munna Bhai films, Jadoo Ki Jhappi and Gandhigiri became part of our everyday lingo…but the films didn't aim for it. In 3 Idiots, even after hearing Aamir spell it out umpteen times, offering a Paul Coelho-esque placebo pill to our problems in life…the script actually engineers Virus' reversal by staging a childbirth so bizarre, the Farelly brothers might call a hit on Hirani for coming up with it first. On the day that the 3 Idiots are expelled from the institute, the city is very conveniently flooded in a deluge of biblical proportions. Virus' daughter (Mona Singh), again very conveniently, happens to go into labour at just the moment. His other daughter, Rancho's insipid love-interest Pia (Kareena Kapoor), conveniently happens to be away in a hospital they can't get to…and the 3 Idiots happen to cross their paths just as conveniently! So Rancho, inspired by the Deepika Padukone BSNL ad, proceeds to deliver the child via medical counseling by Pia over the webcam. Oh shoot…the lights are out and the mother's too weak to push! Fear not, Rancho, just like his brilliant salt water innovation, comes up with an idea to not only generate electricity with an inverter (duh!) but suck the baby out of the tired mother's womb with the help of a…vacuum cleaner! But that's not the clincher. This birth of an innovation tied in with that of an actual birth (I can already see people reading into the brilliance of this twinning!), is made all the more significant when the apparently stillborn baby responds and comes to life upon hearing the term All Izz Well! The whole setup of the catchphrase is finally given its iconicity-cementing payoff in this most excogitated of scenes I've ever seen! And yes, Virus finally learns that true brilliance lies not in education by rote, but in knowledge with illustration. Hear, hear!

But even if one were to overlook all these, can someone please help me justify the number of loopholes that this script has? Pray why is Pia getting married to the same loser that she'd rejected 9 years earlier? Why does Virus react the way he does when he sees Raju at Pia's wedding…especially after he'd made his peace with the 3 Idiots when they graduated? Why didn't Farhan and Raju never bother to ask Rancho's address, and even if they didn't why did they not bother enquiring with the college about it since it is made amply clear later that he didn't provide a wrong address? And why didn't Pia, being the Principal's daughter, get the address out of her father, especially since she so easily accesses the keys to his office? Why did Rancho keep his secret from his best buddies and Pia?

This brings me to the 'secret' in question. The film hinges at the intermission on a curveball so sharp, I felt the film had suddenly been hijacked by Stephen King. Thankfully, and unfortunately (!), that wasn't the case. Rancho was never Rancho we realize. The son of a gardener, he, like good Will Hunting, had a penchant for learning…solving grade 10 problems while old enough to be in the 6th! Upon learning this, his master decides to fund his education until he grows up and earns a degree in Engineering! All this because his own son, the real Rancho, is a duffer…and the old man is planning ahead, knowing that the degree will help in getting roadway contracts for his son in the future! Talk about long-term planning. The kid was in the 6th grade…you devised a plan right until his graduation in Engineering! Anyway, our loyal, un-ghostly but equally phantasmal, doppelganger disappears after securing his degree and hands it over to the real Rancho. He studied, we are told, not to get a job but for the sheer joy of learning!

So who was he? The answer is revealed in the Ladakh-set climax, where we finally realize why Ranchod baba gave such pop-sermons during his stay at ICE. Like the Lama, a hop and skip away in Dharamsala, our Rancho is actually a Tibetan chap called Phunsuk Wangdu! Yes, not only is Aamir Khan playing a 22 year old, he's also supposedly a Tibetan! Wangdu has set up a school that encourages innovation and education the way he believes it should be. Wangdu is what Ram Nikumbh of Taare Zameen Par was before he came down to Mumbai ! Noble, again…but shouldn't Wangdu be proud of what he's done…and get his friends in on it and as many people as possible. Instead, the only person he chooses to write a letter and invite to be a part of his noble scheme is a vertically challenged help from ICE…not his two best buddies or the girl he loved! Why? Cuz otherwise there wouldn't be the contrivance of the all-important, plane-landing, pants-forgetting and wedding-abandoning journey to attain enlightenment from the Tibetan baba literally at the top of the world!

It's not just the contrivances though. The laziness! I like Hirani quite a lot, but how many times is he going to have a free thinker (Munna, Rancho) teach a Boman-in-some-getup (and the audience by extension) to see the flaw in his tenets of living and adopt the more ideal fulfilling approach towards life. It's not just the concept of a funny social message giving film that is getting repetitive; it's also the situations and the characters. Boman in all three films has now personified the face of the ills of the society, clique, group, etc. that the film in question seeks to question. In both Munna Bhai MBBS and 3 Idiots, he plays the authoritative mean-spirited head of administration. Like the orientation scene in Munna Bhai MBBS where Sanjay Dutt raises his hand and asks a befuddling question to Boman, you have Aamir raising his hand here and asking Boman a similarly innocent yet foxing question at the orientation! In Lage Raho Munna Bhai you had Jimmy Shergill being coaxed to overcome his fear and come clean to his father, played by Parikshit Sahni, following which they bond and shed a few manly tears. Here too you have Madhavan being coaxed to overcome his fear and reveal his true aspirations to his father following which they shed a few manly tears. Who plays the father, you ask? Why of course, Parikshit Sahni! If Munna Bhai MBBS had a comatose patient and a jilted lover who'd attempted suicide and a young man fated to die early…all being revitalized by Munna with his practical musings and a zappy song, you have in 3 Idiots, an amalgamation of all the three cases of Munna Bhai MBBS in Sharman when he attempts a suicide, ends up comatose and is slated to die! And we have the winsome Munna in Rancho's avatar working his humour to get him out of it! But how am I supposed to feel any anxiety or any emotion when we know, right from the beginning, that Sharman is alive…since he's undertaking the journey with Madhavan! It's not so much about 'will he make it?', as much as it is about 'how will he make it?', then! It robs this development of any pathos that it could have had.

And that is something I am very curious about. For a director unashamed of displaying emotions, Hirani seems very intent on being un-melodramatic here…to the extent where he trivializes everything with a comic yield. His approach is very commendable, especially in an age where melodrama is a curse word, but what's the point of spoofing Raju's abject poverty as a 50s film? It offends as a comedy for someone who's lived very close to such an existence, and fails as a drama for someone who's never experienced it. Why would you have a paralyzed man flailing his limbs wildly sandwiched between two people atop a scooter on his way to the hospital? These are zany yes, but to what end?

It is the humour then, most of all, which I didn't get in the least bit all. 27 instances of pissing, farting and pants being dropped to offer a posterior salute…these are funny…but in a puerile, childish and slapstick way. This is surely not the comical genius evident in Munna Bhai MBBS and Lage Raho Munna Bhai. Or for that matter is a rolling pin flattening dough after it has been used to scratch a grey-haired chest funny or simply gross? Is the substitution of the word chamatkar with balatkar and dhan with stan really the argument against rote learning that it pretends to be or merely an excuse to bring down the house with its innuendo? Would we have celebrated this comedy of confusion in an Akshay Kumar film where they wouldn't have been canny enough in disguising the cheap humour as an important lesson? And isn't that ultimately what 3 Idiots sadly is all about? Cheap humorous gags passed off in the guise of an important social film!

Rating- **

P.S.- I realize I haven't spoken about the performances. Aamir Khan adopts a fine body language and behaves every bit a 22 year old. Notice him especially in the scene where Boman hauls him to the classroom…Aamir lets his body loose so that he isn't walking with Boman, but being dragged. No matter how good a performance, I still can't fathom why we needed a 44 year old 'playing' a 22 year old…however believable he makes it by virtue of his talent. Sharman Joshi's is the performance you take home. His Raju, despite Hirani's efforts otherwise, emerges as the emotional voice of the film. His attempted suicide played to an Opera (a wonderful use of the setup earlier), his waking up drunk in classroom and his interview scene are the highlights. Sharman truly shines in  this one. Madhavan has the least role of the three, but he is effective in his part oozing with an affecting sincerity. Kareena Kapoor unfortunately has become so used to her glam roles that for the first time she is having difficulty being herself even! Omi Vaidya, though a bit loud I felt, was nevertheless interesting. Boman Irani worked for me in a big way. In a script that didn't bother to look at the other side, of people who have invariably become a part of the system not by choice but because they didn't think there was any other way, Boman lends his character with a nice air of desperate authority. Watch him especially as he clings on to his being right when he accepts defeat to Rancho but insists that he was right about the gravity-defying pen. He is a man who did all that was told to him, followed it to the point without questioning it…but finally realizes that maybe, just maybe, he was cheated after all!

P.P.S. – The film borrows from Scent of a Woman, Dead Poets Society, Good Will Hunting, School Ties and Teaching Mrs. Tingle apart from others. It also borrows gags from chain-mails like the man clicking a picture of the 5 burqa-clad women, to name one.

It's Chetan Bhagat versus the rest on Twitter

Until Monday, Chetan Bhagat was one of the most followed Indians on
Twitter. The bestselling author of Five Point Someone, One Night at
the Call Center, Three Mistakes of My Life and more recently, Two
States, had more than 27,000 followers and was possibly one of the
most accessible Indian celebrities on the popular microblogging site.

All that changed around 5 pm Monday evening when he blocked Saad
Akhtar, a Delhi-based writer and cartoonist who runs a web comic
called FlyYouFools, who poked fun at Bhagat's apparent bad mood by
saying, "In a bad mood today, aren't we? Let me guess: Royalty check
came in?" Akhtar retweeted that message, which otherwise would have
been regular reply on Bhagat's and Akhtar's Twitter timeline.

This act triggered an avalanche. In the next couple of hours, a large
part of the Indian Twitterati seemed to rise against the "block". So
much so that, the hashtag #Chetanblocks became a trending topic on
Twitter's home page.

A flurry of messages, accusations, counter-accusations, one-liners and
cartoon strips followed. Around 8 pm or so, a video spoof came up on
YouTube showing German dictator Adolf Hitler getting upset that Chetan
Bhagat has blocked him.

Akhtar, whose Twitter handle is also called "FlyyouFools", was
responding to Bhagat agonising over the piracy of his books in three
different tweets: 1) "Almost anyone who is reading my pirated books
can afford the original. It hurts me a lot personally. Just sharing."
2) "Piracy kills publishers, esp domestic literature. Gives incentive
writers to move westwards. Don't do it if you care for Indian
creativity." And 3) At a broader level, a society that doesn't respect
intellectual property never excels at innovation. See what kind of
India u want."

Bhagat, whose latest book Two States retails at Rs 95 - around the
same price as a pirated book - told Akhtar he would block him if he
continued to be smart alecky in his messages, and when the latter did
not stop, Bhagat blocked him.

Bhagat in Hong Kong
The author is currently in Hong Kong helping a friend set up a new
company, and did not respond to our phone calls or emails, but he did
put out a clarification on his Twitter account saying he stands by his
decision to block Akhtar.

"Today, someone who had done so many times, trivialised my commitment
to India," he wrote. "Few things can hurt me more. I still didn't
block him and told him to stop. He enjoyed the attention and ridiculed
that as well. I took a call and blocked him... I stand by my decision
to block him, and I think I have the right to. Am aware tweets can
still be accessed. Just don't want him in my timeline."

Mail Today asked Akhtar if he and Bhagat followers on Twitter went too
far. "The situation got out of hand," he said. "He was angry over his
books being pirated and I kind of made fun of the fact that he's
getting a little too righteous about it as he was bringing in Indian
culture and intellectual property rights into it. So anyway I made a
smartass comment on it, which is what I do - I run a web comic after
all. He didn't like that, warned me that he'll block me if I didn't
stop. So I retweeted that message and he blocked me. All well and
good, except that fact that he blocked me (and a couple of others) got
picked up by other Tweeple and started gaining momentum. Pretty soon
#chetanblocks was trending on Twitter's home page and it quickly
degenerated into an angry mob."

'Price of fame of celebrities'
Delhi-based communications professional and active Twitterer Surekha
Pillai said the entire exchange - which lasted around four hours - was
"the price of fame of celebrities had to pay on a democratic medium
like Twitter", but also felt it went too far. "I believe it went way
too far," Pillai said. "While it was amusing to begin with, it was not
when it spiralled out of control with a virtual mob ganging up against
Chetan."

Chetan Bhagat and Twitter

Writer's 'block' for Chetan-baiters on Twitter

Chetan Bhagat's one night on Twitter

Author's threat to block tweeple, after his tweet on piracy leads to
argument, backfires

Author Chetan Bhagat rubbed his followers on Twitter the wrong way
last evening, after his tweet lamenting piracy of his books led to an
argument with two other tweeters, whom he later threatened to block.

A few hours after the argument, one Nikhil Narayanan started the
#chetanblocks hashtag group, which received an overwhelming response.

People started tweeting from 6 pm and this went on till the wee hours
of the morning, making it the trendiest topic for the day.

Most tweeters were anti-Bhagat with some ridiculing his comments to
block followers, but the author did find support in a few.

How it started...

@Chetan_Bhagat posted a tweet at 4 pm saying, 'Almost anyone who is
reading my pirated books can afford the original. It hurts me a lot
personally. Just sharing."

He added, "Piracy kills publishers, esp domestic literature. Gives
incentive writers to move westwards. Don't do it if you care for
Indian creativity.

At a broader level, a society that doesn't respect intellectual
property never excels at innovation. See what kind of India u want".

To this a tweeter @flyyoufools commented: "Tying everything to India's
progress today, aren't we?"
And the debate took an ugly turn. Bhagat tweeted, "Well it is tied to
progress. Close ur eyes to it if u want to."
Flyyoufools tweeted back, "In a bad mood today, aren't we? Let me
guess: Royalty check came in?

This enraged Bhagat who wrote, 'buddy, one more smart one and u r blocked. ok?

This didn't to go down well with other tweeters. Tweeter Jojo Philip
popped in with 'Don't blame the consumer. If he/she gets the product
at a fifth of its cost, they have every right to pick it up'.

Now, Bhagat was on the edge and he said, 'If i can access your bank
account, i have the right to steal from it?

Pat came the reply from Jojiphilip, 'Piracy happens only when there is
huge gap between d market cost & buying it otherwise. Greedy
publishers plz note

There is a nexus between cops, illegal printers & publishers who r
responsible for piracy. Attack d system, not the consumer."

Block no 2

And the argument continued with Bhagat tweeting, 'nobody is greedy. if
u cant afford it, dont buy it. do u steal cars if u cant afford them?

Jojiphilip was in no mood to accept defeat. He wrote, 'No, i don't
steal cars, but if someone was offering me one for Rs 1000, i wud buy
it.

Blame the guy who is offering me this. as a consumer i have done no
wrong. I have paid the guy on the street corner my hard earned Rs 100
& i did not steal it from him.'

Bhagat seemed to be losing his cool. And gave one more threat to block
the prompt tweeter. The author posted, 'U have. ask a lawyer. And one
more defense of illegal stuff and will block u. ok?

Following this, the portal was flooded with thousands of others with
the author finding no support. The debate was still raging when the
paper went to press.

#chetanblocks Rocks !